PDA

View Full Version : Just a thought...


mile high
07-20-2007, 12:45 PM
Can anyone explain this to me? Whenever I'm walking through town - by myself or with a group of guys - ladies generally don't give me a second glance. Yet, when I'm walking through town with a girl on each arm, then the ladies start looking?? I brought this up with a friend and she said guys do the same thing if she's walking around with a couple of male friends. Any ideas?

Does having people of the opposite gender surrounding you indicate you're somehow more attractive or interesting? Does it make others want to know what all the fuss is about?

A female friend of mine once remarked to me, "Whenever I hang out with you, girls look at me like they wanna kick my ass"

So, I'd like to try this experiment sometime:

...Go shopping with a platonic female friend, but appear to be a couple
...When I notice a girl looking at me, send my "girlfriend" to the changing rooms or something.
...Then try to pick up the girl who was checking me out.

Of course, this experiment has a couple of flaws...such as, although it's not really cheating, the test subjects would think it was. And, should I actually manage to meet a girl this way and it turns into something more meaningful (doubtful), how would I explain the experiment to her?

mile high
07-21-2007, 12:49 AM
This strategy is called 'pawning' your girl friends when you use them to arouse interest in other girls.

UltimateNaneki
07-21-2007, 01:23 AM
nope, if u were with two girls, I would wonder what was wrong with the girls!!

mile high
07-21-2007, 01:26 AM
nope, if u were with two girls, I would wonder what was wrong with the girls!!

Ouch!! :lmao

Reality hits!

My_Secrets_Kept
07-21-2007, 01:31 AM
...
So, I'd like to try this experiment sometime:

...Go shopping with a platonic female friend, but appear to be a couple
...When I notice a girl looking at me, send my "girlfriend" to the changing rooms or something.
...Then try to pick up the girl who was checking me out.

Of course, this experiment has a couple of flaws...such as, although it's not really cheating, the test subjects would think it was. And, should I actually manage to meet a girl this way and it turns into something more meaningful (doubtful), how would I explain the experiment to her?

If she was indeed interested in you, you wouldn't need to deceive her. You could tell her that you were just spending time with a friend, which would be the truth. There would be no need to explain the experiment to someone that you'd only just met, would there?

hoss
07-21-2007, 01:33 AM
Can anyone explain this to me? Whenever I'm walking through town - by myself or with a group of guys - ladies generally don't give me a second glance. Yet, when I'm walking through town with a girl on each arm, then the ladies start looking?? I brought this up with a friend and she said guys do the same thing if she's walking around with a couple of male friends. Any ideas?

Does having people of the opposite gender surrounding you indicate you're somehow more attractive or interesting? Does it make others want to know what all the fuss is about?

A female friend of mine once remarked to me, "Whenever I hang out with you, girls look at me like they wanna kick my ass"

So, I'd like to try this experiment sometime:

...Go shopping with a platonic female friend, but appear to be a couple
...When I notice a girl looking at me, send my "girlfriend" to the changing rooms or something.
...Then try to pick up the girl who was checking me out.

Of course, this experiment has a couple of flaws...such as, although it's not really cheating, the test subjects would think it was. And, should I actually manage to meet a girl this way and it turns into something more meaningful (doubtful), how would I explain the experiment to her?

hey dude ....i done mean to be harsh here ...but why are u so hung up on what people think of u ??..u have posted across many threads about your apperance and what people think of u ,or how u look to others ....

u come across as arrogant and vain ,u post your sexual prowless all over the site ...and frankly u keep saying that women dont give u the time of day through many different serarios ,whether u have glasses on or have two women on each arm ...

and reffering to women as " test subjects " says alot about u ...and as for explaining to a woman about your experiments ....well why dont we let the women here remark on that one ....

thinking u are gods gift to women doesnt make u one ...

mile high
07-21-2007, 01:41 AM
If she was indeed interested in you, you wouldn't need to deceive her. You could tell her that you were just spending time with a friend, which would be the truth. There would be no need to explain the experiment to someone that you'd only just met, would there?

I best say now...I'm not really serious about carrying out the experiment. For one, my female friends would not stand for such behaviour in their company :(

But, yeah, I agree, deceiving people is not the best way of setting up a encounter. Doesn't stop me playing with the idea though! ;)

My_Secrets_Kept
07-21-2007, 01:46 AM
I best say now...I'm not really serious about carrying out the experiment. For one, my female friends would not stand for such behaviour in their company :(

But, yeah, I agree, deceiving people is not the best way of setting up a encounter. Doesn't stop me playing with the idea though! ;)

Yes there is a difference btwn contemplating something & actually following through on it. If the woman were to ever find out about such an experiment she'd probably be saying tootaloo to you! I wouldn't take kindly to this type of behavior. imo it's kinda up there with the fella's who use their kids to hook women for the sole purpose of having a sexual encounter.

mile high
07-21-2007, 01:57 AM
hey dude ....i done mean to be harsh here ...but why are u so hung up on what people think of u ??..u have posted across many threads about your apperance and what people think of u ,or how u look to others ....

u come across as arrogant and vain ,u post your sexual prowless all over the site ...and frankly u keep saying that women dont give u the time of day through many different serarios ,whether u have glasses on or have two women on each arm ...

and reffering to women as " test subjects " says alot about u ...and as for explaining to a woman about your experiments ....well why dont we let the women here remark on that one ....

thinking u are gods gift to women doesnt make u one ...

Wow, sounds like you've been storing up things up for a while. Sorry I make you feel that way.

I'm aware I can come across as a dick at times, but didn't think I was all that bad. Half of what I say is in jest, the other half because I'm provocative by nature, but either way, I don't mean to offend.

I am confused about who I am - that's why I'm unsure about myself. I'm pretty self-deluded though, again, I'm sorry for being like that. Perhaps you can put me on global ignore?

I've been tolerated here more than on any other site I've joined, but I'll take this as a sign I should think more before posting. The thing is though, I might not be myself if I did that.

mile high
07-21-2007, 02:04 AM
Yes there is a difference btwn contemplating something & actually following through on it. If the woman were to ever find out about such an experiment she'd probably be saying tootaloo to you! I wouldn't take kindly to this type of behavior. imo it's kinda up there with the fella's who use their kids to hook women for the sole purpose of having a sexual encounter.

I would tell my platonic friend first if I was ever to do such a thing. But, like I said...none of them would be a part of something this moronic. I might wind them up a little about doing it though.

The difference with using a child is that you're totally exploiting them, your authority over them, and they have no choice. I would never do that.

hoss
07-21-2007, 02:30 AM
Wow, sounds like you've been storing up things up for a while. Sorry I make you feel that way.

I'm aware I can come across as a dick at times, but didn't think I was all that bad. Half of what I say is in jest, the other half because I'm provocative by nature, but either way, I don't mean to offend.

I am confused about who I am - that's why I'm unsure about myself. I'm pretty self-deluded though, again, I'm sorry for being like that. Perhaps you can put me on global ignore?

I've been tolerated here more than on any other site I've joined, but I'll take this as a sign I should think more before posting. The thing is though, I might not be myself if I did that.

no harm...Im really glad i made u think about what u post ....I'm sorry that your confused about who u are ,and since u cant tell when someone is saying something with a smile or not ,u need to read how other people will take what u post ...

we dont want to tolerate u ,we want to get to know u...but u do come across strong sometimes.....as for ignore ...why would i do that ,then i would miss all the interesting things u would say ...( see...i said that with a smile ).................:wa:

mile high
07-21-2007, 03:16 AM
no harm...Im really glad i made u think about what u post ....I'm sorry that your confused about who u are ,and since u cant tell when someone is saying something with a smile or not ,u need to read how other people will take what u post ...

we dont want to tolerate u ,we want to get to know u...but u do come across strong sometimes.....as for ignore ...why would i do that ,then i would miss all the interesting things u would say ...( see...i said that with a smile ).................:wa:

Thanks, mate...I can see your intentions are all good.

You're a cool guy :wa: